Company Analysis UP Fintech Holding Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (49.22%) is higher than the sector average (-13.17%).
- Current debt level 4.3% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 5.03%.
Disadvantages
- Price (5.76 $) is higher than fair price (3.32 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (3.71%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=6.66%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=36.59%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| UP Fintech Holding Limited | High Tech | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -13.1% | -2.9% | 2.3% |
| 90 days | -21.2% | -7.8% | 6.3% |
| 1 year | 49.2% | -13.2% | 31.5% |
TIGR vs Sector: UP Fintech Holding Limited has outperformed the "High Tech" sector by 62.39% over the past year.
TIGR vs Market: UP Fintech Holding Limited has outperformed the market by 17.71% over the past year.
Stable price: TIGR is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: TIGR with weekly volatility of 0.9466% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (5.76 $) is higher than the fair price (3.32 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (5.76 $) is 42.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (20.32) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (19.69).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (20.32) is lower than that of the market as a whole (49.05).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.34) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.75).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.34) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.18).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.43) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.96).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.43) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.24).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-12.47) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.12).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-12.47) is lower than that of the market as a whole (28.35).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -130.38% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (-0.1119%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-130.38%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (-0.1119%) is lower than the return for the sector (3449.28%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (6.66%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (36.59%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (6.66%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.67%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.8693%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.48%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.8693%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.44%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (3.48%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.47%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (3.48%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '3.71%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
