Company Analysis The E.W. Scripps Company
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (21.95%) is higher than the sector average (18.85%).
- Current debt level 51.68% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 53.77%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=11.82%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-61.69%)
Disadvantages
- Price (2.5 $) is higher than fair price (2.29 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.19%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
The E.W. Scripps Company | Telecom | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 15.7% | -6.7% | -0.3% |
90 days | 4.6% | -6% | 10% |
1 year | 22% | 18.8% | 9.7% |
SSP vs Sector: The E.W. Scripps Company has outperformed the "Telecom" sector by 3.1% over the past year.
SSP vs Market: The E.W. Scripps Company has outperformed the market by 12.22% over the past year.
Stable price: SSP is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: SSP with weekly volatility of 0.4221% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (2.5 $) is higher than the fair price (2.29 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (2.5 $) is 8.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (1.18) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.22).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (1.18) is lower than that of the market as a whole (89.86).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.1313) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-5.04).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.1313) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.35).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.0689) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.65).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.0689) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.1).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (4.93) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.18).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (4.93) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.71).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -9.13% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-9.13%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.01%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (11.82%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-61.69%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (11.82%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (11.64%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.76%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.1%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.76%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.88%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (4.03%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.11%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (4.03%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.19%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (24.5%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription