MAX
Company Analysis Oculis Holding AG Warrants
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (15.22 $) is less than fair price (15.79 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (101.2%) is higher than the sector average (1.7%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-102.66%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=253.66%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Oculis Holding AG Warrants | Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 10.4% | -1.4% | -3.1% |
| 90 days | 116.2% | -1.2% | -1.2% |
| 1 year | 101.2% | 1.7% | 13% |
OCSAW vs Sector: Oculis Holding AG Warrants has outperformed the "" sector by 99.5% over the past year.
OCSAW vs Market: Oculis Holding AG Warrants has outperformed the market by 88.2% over the past year.
Slightly volatile price: OCSAW is more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical deviations of about +/- 5-15% per week.
Long period: OCSAW with weekly volatility of 1.95% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (15.22 $) is lower than the fair price (15.79 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (15.22 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 3.7%.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-4.58) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-335.61).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-4.58) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-107.89).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.9) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-1320.1).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.9) is lower than that of the market as a whole (72.83).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (28.76).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (116.06).
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-870.14).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-81.5).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 72.47% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (72.47%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-46.03%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-102.66%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (253.66%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-102.66%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (-6.44%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-73.09%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-37.56%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-73.09%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.41%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.36%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
