Company Analysis NioCorp Developments Ltd. Warrant
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (374.63%) is higher than the sector average (-43.19%).
- Current debt level 0% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 47.81%.
Disadvantages
- Price (2.73 $) is higher than fair price (1.81 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.27%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-61.45%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.23%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| NioCorp Developments Ltd. Warrant | Materials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0.7% | 0.8% | -0.7% |
| 90 days | 34.1% | -43.7% | 2.3% |
| 1 year | 374.6% | -43.2% | 19.8% |
NIOBW vs Sector: NioCorp Developments Ltd. Warrant has outperformed the "Materials" sector by 417.82% over the past year.
NIOBW vs Market: NioCorp Developments Ltd. Warrant has outperformed the market by 354.84% over the past year.
Stable price: NIOBW is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NIOBW with weekly volatility of 7.2% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (2.73 $) is higher than the fair price (1.81 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (2.73 $) is 33.7% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-9.24) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (34.17).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-9.24) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-99.49).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (5.68) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.09).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (5.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.56).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.19).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (147.17).
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.85).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-111.72).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 52.16% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (52.16%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-61.45%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.23%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-61.45%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (-6.24%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-39.72%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.23%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-39.72%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.46%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.37%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.59%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.27%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
