Company Analysis Minerva Neurosciences, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (1.62 $) is less than fair price (2.41 $)
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=105.44%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=9.69%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.5448%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-41.94%) is lower than the sector average (-22.93%).
- Current debt level 144.14% has increased over 5 years from 0.3666%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Minerva Neurosciences, Inc. | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.2% | -20% | 2% |
| 90 days | -26.7% | -23.9% | -9.8% |
| 1 year | -41.9% | -22.9% | 10.1% |
NERV vs Sector: Minerva Neurosciences, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Healthcare" sector by -19.01% over the past year.
NERV vs Market: Minerva Neurosciences, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -52.06% over the past year.
Stable price: NERV is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NERV with weekly volatility of -0.8065% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (1.62 $) is lower than the fair price (2.41 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (1.62 $) is 48.8% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (57.21).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.7).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-1.56) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.65).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-1.56) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.42).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (16.17) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (33.44).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (16.17) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.24).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-3.7) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-17.68).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-3.7) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.23).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -329.21% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-329.21%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (156.84%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (105.44%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (9.69%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (105.44%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (8.97%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-52.73%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.2896%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-52.73%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.31%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.63%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.96%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.5448%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
