MAX Chat
Company Analysis NeoGenomics, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (7.39 $) is less than fair price (12.94 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.527%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-54.91%) is lower than the sector average (0%).
- Current debt level 36.95% has increased over 5 years from 18.73%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-8.54%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=14.17%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| NeoGenomics, Inc. | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0.4% | -48.5% | 0.8% |
| 90 days | -19% | 2.2% | 31.6% |
| 1 year | -54.9% | 0% | 15.9% |
NEO vs Sector: NeoGenomics, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Healthcare" sector by -54.91% over the past year.
NEO vs Market: NeoGenomics, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -70.78% over the past year.
Stable price: NEO is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NEO with weekly volatility of -1.06% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (7.39 $) is lower than the fair price (12.94 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (7.39 $) is 75.1% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (46.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (64.15).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (46.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (90.03).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.475) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.96).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.475) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.39).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.6489) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (32.77).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.6489) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.12).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-441.38) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (274.79).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-441.38) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.91).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -394.89% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-394.89%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-15.75%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-8.54%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.17%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-8.54%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.64%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-4.74%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.18%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-4.74%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-2.29%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.63%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-2.29%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.08%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.527%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
