Company Analysis NeoGenomics, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (10.23 $) is less than fair price (13.73 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.5448%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-30.55%) is lower than the sector average (-22.93%).
- Current debt level 32.35% has increased over 5 years from 18.73%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-9.34%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=9.69%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| NeoGenomics, Inc. | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.9% | -20% | 0.2% |
| 90 days | -42.8% | -23.9% | -10.2% |
| 1 year | -30.5% | -22.9% | 9.1% |
NEO vs Sector: NeoGenomics, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Healthcare" sector by -7.62% over the past year.
NEO vs Market: NeoGenomics, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -39.64% over the past year.
Stable price: NEO is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NEO with weekly volatility of -0.5875% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (10.23 $) is lower than the fair price (13.73 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (10.23 $) is 34.2% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (46.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (57.21).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (46.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.7).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.76) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.65).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.76) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.42).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (4.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (33.44).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (4.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.24).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-440.38) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-17.68).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-440.38) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.23).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -438.9% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-438.9%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (156.84%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-9.34%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.69%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-9.34%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.97%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-5.23%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.2896%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-5.23%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.31%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-2.29%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.63%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-2.29%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.96%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.5448%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
