Company Analysis Infrared Cameras Holdings, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (1.16 $) is less than fair price (1.97 $)
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=8308.96%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=29.17%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.7996%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-53.39%) is lower than the sector average (-8.42%).
- Current debt level 44.16% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Infrared Cameras Holdings, Inc. | Industrials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 5.4% | -9.9% | 0.2% |
| 90 days | -20.4% | -20% | -10.2% |
| 1 year | -53.4% | -8.4% | 9.1% |
MSAI vs Sector: Infrared Cameras Holdings, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Industrials" sector by -44.96% over the past year.
MSAI vs Market: Infrared Cameras Holdings, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -62.47% over the past year.
Stable price: MSAI is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MSAI with weekly volatility of -1.03% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (1.16 $) is lower than the fair price (1.97 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (1.16 $) is 69.8% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (38.02).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.7).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-94.33) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.09).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-94.33) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.42).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (4.66) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.89).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (4.66) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.24).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-1.41) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.55).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-1.41) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.23).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0.1599%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (8308.96%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (29.17%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (8308.96%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (8.97%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-136.01%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.44%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-136.01%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.31%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.63%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.96%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.7996%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
