MAX
Company Analysis Missfresh Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.038 $) is less than fair price (0.0498 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is higher than the sector average (-35.87%).
- Current debt level 2.78% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 69.48%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=97.29%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=12.82%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.25%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Missfresh Limited | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | 0.1% | -1.3% |
| 90 days | 0% | -3.4% | -0.3% |
| 1 year | 0% | -35.9% | 14.2% |
MF vs Sector: Missfresh Limited has outperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by 35.87% over the past year.
MF vs Market: Missfresh Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -14.21% over the past year.
Stable price: MF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MF with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.038 $) is lower than the fair price (0.0498 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.038 $) is 31.1% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-0.000192) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (22.23).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-0.000192) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-107.89).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-0.000367) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.07).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-0.000367) is lower than that of the market as a whole (72.83).
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.000203) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.57).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.000203) is lower than that of the market as a whole (116.06).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0.0127) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.11).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0.0127) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-81.5).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 37.38% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (37.38%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (84.93%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (97.29%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (12.82%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (97.29%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-6.44%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-832.64%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.57%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-832.64%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.41%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.71%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.36%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.25%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
