NASDAQ: MAT - Mattel

Yield per half year: -0.3222%
Sector: Consumer Discretionary

Company Analysis Mattel

Download the report: word Word pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • The stock's return over the last year (-4.38%) is higher than the sector average (-46.66%).
  • Current debt level 37.4% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 54.58%.
  • The company's current efficiency (ROE=9.98%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-22.73%)

Disadvantages

  • Price (18.56 $) is higher than fair price (8.15 $)
  • Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.3953%).

Similar companies

Hasbro

Ross Stores

Marriott International

eBay

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.2. News

2.3. Market efficiency

Mattel Consumer Discretionary Index
7 days -1.3% 0% -1.6%
90 days -4.1% 7.2% 6.3%
1 year -4.4% -46.7% 34.4%

MAT vs Sector: Mattel has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 42.28% over the past year.

MAT vs Market: Mattel has significantly underperformed the market by -38.83% over the past year.

Stable price: MAT is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: MAT with weekly volatility of -0.0842% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 31.85
P/S: 1.25

3.2. Revenue

EPS 0.6004
ROE 9.98%
ROA 3.33%
ROIC 27.51%
Ebitda margin 10.32%

4. Fundamental Analysis

4.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Above fair price: The current price (18.56 $) is higher than the fair price (8.15 $).

Price is higher than fair: The current price (18.56 $) is 56.1% higher than the fair price.

4.2. P/E

P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (31.85) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.54).

P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (31.85) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.05).

4.2.1 P/E Similar companies

4.3. P/BV

P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.18) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.4319).

P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.18) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.1).

4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies

4.4. P/S

P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.25) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.79).

P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.25) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.14).

4.4.1 P/S Similar companies

4.5. EV/Ebitda

EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (14.66) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.81).

EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (14.66) is lower than that of the market as a whole (19.1).

5. Profitability

5.1. Profitability and revenue

5.2. Earnings per share - EPS

5.3. Past profitability Net Income

Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -40.08% over the last 5 years.

Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-40.08%).

Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (8.28%).

5.4. ROE

ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (9.98%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-22.73%).

ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (9.98%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.87%).

5.5. ROA

ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.33%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.41%).

ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.33%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.5%).

5.6. ROIC

ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (27.51%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (9.46%).

ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (27.51%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).

6. Finance

6.1. Assets and debt

Debt level: (37.4%) is quite low in relation to assets.

Debt reduction: over 5 years, the debt has decreased from 54.58% to 37.4%.

Excess of debt: The debt is not covered by net income, percentage 1122.78%.

6.2. Profit growth and share price

7. Dividends

7.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.3953%.

7.2. Stability and increase in payments

Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.5.

Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

7.3. Payout percentage

Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.

8. Insider trades

8.1. Insider trading

Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

8.2. Latest transactions

Transaction date Insider Type Price Volume Quantity
04.08.2023 Isaias Zanatta Roberto Jacobo
EVP & Chief Supply Chain Offr
Sale 20.36 509 000 25 000
03.08.2023 Hugh Yoon J.
SVP & Corporate Controller
Sale 21.25 208 059 9 791

Pay for your subscription

More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription