Company Analysis Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (28.63%) is higher than the sector average (-48.17%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=19.1%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-25.78%)
Disadvantages
- Price (12.49 $) is higher than fair price (11.7 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.2633%).
- Current debt level 71.54% has increased over 5 years from 40.9%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 4.1% | -47.2% | -0.1% |
| 90 days | 4.9% | -47.1% | 13.8% |
| 1 year | 28.6% | -48.2% | 29.4% |
LIND vs Sector: Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 76.8% over the past year.
LIND vs Market: Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has underperformed the market marginally by -0.8154% over the past year.
Stable price: LIND is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LIND with weekly volatility of 0.5506% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (12.49 $) is higher than the fair price (11.7 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (12.49 $) is 6.3% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-23.42) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (48.54).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-23.42) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-78.44).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-4.45) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (189.47).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-4.45) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.48).
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.01) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2007.38).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.01) is lower than that of the market as a whole (136.11).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (14.73) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-41.52).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (14.73) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-46.89).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -13.77% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-13.77%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (19.1%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-25.78%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (19.1%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-10.11%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-3.65%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-16.15%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-3.65%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (39.27%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.26%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.7%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.2633%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
