Company Analysis I-Mab
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.959 $) is less than fair price (1.45 $)
- Current debt level 4.24% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 7.19%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.5399%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-43.92%) is lower than the sector average (-37.33%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-85.31%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=9.39%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| I-Mab | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0.6% | -1.7% | 2% |
| 90 days | -10.4% | -40.1% | 5.5% |
| 1 year | -43.9% | -37.3% | 26% |
IMAB vs Sector: I-Mab has significantly underperformed the "Healthcare" sector by -6.59% over the past year.
IMAB vs Market: I-Mab has significantly underperformed the market by -69.88% over the past year.
Stable price: IMAB is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: IMAB with weekly volatility of -0.8446% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.959 $) is lower than the fair price (1.45 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.959 $) is 51.2% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (32.94) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (61.47).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (32.94) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.48).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.5861) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.79).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.5861) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.44).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (36.43) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (33.58).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (36.43) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.3).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0.8341) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-17.26).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0.8341) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.6).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -82.25% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-82.25%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (11.51%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-85.31%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.39%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-85.31%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.95%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-56.09%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.1519%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-56.09%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.3%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-45.63%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.63%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-45.63%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.5399%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
