MAX Chat
Company Analysis Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Current debt level 5.01% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 39.46%.
Disadvantages
- Price (8.06 $) is higher than fair price (3.28 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.67%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-29.9%) is lower than the sector average (-29.29%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=3.94%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=42.29%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. | High Tech | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2% | -0.1% | 0.8% |
| 90 days | 7.5% | -22.7% | 31.6% |
| 1 year | -29.9% | -29.3% | 15.9% |
IAS vs Sector: Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. has slightly underperformed the "High Tech" sector by -0.6073% over the past year.
IAS vs Market: Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. has significantly underperformed the market by -45.77% over the past year.
Stable price: IAS is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: IAS with weekly volatility of -0.5749% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (8.06 $) is higher than the fair price (3.28 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (8.06 $) is 59.3% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (45.71) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (15.64).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (45.71) is lower than that of the market as a whole (90.03).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.71) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.92).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.71) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.39).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.26) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.24).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.26) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.12).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (13.68) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.29).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (13.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.91).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -43.62% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-43.62%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-24.97%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (3.94%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (42.29%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (3.94%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.64%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.23%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.53%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.23%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-3.86%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.47%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-3.86%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.08%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.67%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
