Company Analysis Four Leaf Acquisition Corporation Warrants
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.0313 $) is less than fair price (0.0369 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (25.67%) is higher than the sector average (0%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.54%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=17.8%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Four Leaf Acquisition Corporation Warrants | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 50.2% | -48.6% | -0% |
| 90 days | 0% | -44.9% | -0.9% |
| 1 year | 25.7% | 0% | 19.8% |
FORLW vs Sector: Four Leaf Acquisition Corporation Warrants has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 25.67% over the past year.
FORLW vs Market: Four Leaf Acquisition Corporation Warrants has outperformed the market by 5.89% over the past year.
Stable price: FORLW is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FORLW with weekly volatility of 0.49% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.0313 $) is lower than the fair price (0.0369 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (0.0313 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 17.9%.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-220.93).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-101.02).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (72.57).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (72.02).
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (261.36).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (114).
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-236.48).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-78.04).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (1413.91%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.8%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-6.21%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.64%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.61%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.79%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.54%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
