Company Analysis 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1.3%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-22.73%)
Disadvantages
- Price (7.16 $) is higher than fair price (0.6973 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.3928%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-16.51%) is lower than the sector average (3.19%).
- Current debt level 29.97% has increased over 5 years from 16%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 10% | 1.9% | 0.7% |
90 days | 13.4% | 0.9% | 2.2% |
1 year | -16.5% | 3.2% | 26% |
FLWS vs Sector: 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by -19.7% over the past year.
FLWS vs Market: 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -42.49% over the past year.
Stable price: FLWS is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FLWS with weekly volatility of -0.3175% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (7.16 $) is higher than the fair price (0.6973 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (7.16 $) is 90.3% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (21.25) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.54).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (21.25) is lower than that of the market as a whole (49.04).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.3) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.4319).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.3) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.3301) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.79).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.3301) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.24).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (12.9) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.87).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (12.9) is lower than that of the market as a whole (28.32).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -22.07% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-22.07%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (125.49%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1.3%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-22.73%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1.3%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.71%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-0.5859%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.41%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-0.5859%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.47%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (8.67%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.46%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (8.67%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.3928%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription