Company Analysis Franklin Wireless Corp.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (2.74 $) is less than fair price (4.11 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (42.77%) is higher than the sector average (-2.45%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.6614%).
- Current debt level 3.21% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-10.7%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=17.21%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Franklin Wireless Corp. | Technology | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 12.6% | -5.6% | 0% |
| 90 days | 6.1% | -2.8% | 8.9% |
| 1 year | 42.8% | -2.4% | 30.8% |
FKWL vs Sector: Franklin Wireless Corp. has outperformed the "Technology" sector by 45.22% over the past year.
FKWL vs Market: Franklin Wireless Corp. has outperformed the market by 12.01% over the past year.
Stable price: FKWL is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FKWL with weekly volatility of 0.8226% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (2.74 $) is lower than the fair price (4.11 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (2.74 $) is 50% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (74.89).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.79).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.14) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.38).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.14) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.36).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.34) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.23).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.34) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.23).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-5.15) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (121.46).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-5.15) is lower than that of the market as a whole (28.28).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 32.85% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (38.46%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (32.85%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (38.46%) exceeds the return for the sector (3.23%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-10.7%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.21%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-10.7%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.82%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-7.65%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.21%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-7.65%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.51%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.26%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.6614%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
