Company Analysis DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (9 $) is less than fair price (14.64 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (-36.86%) is higher than the sector average (-46%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=15.8%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-61.69%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.35%).
- Current debt level 4.27% has increased over 5 years from 4.24%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. | Telecom | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -14.2% | -6.6% | 0.8% |
90 days | -7.6% | -48.5% | 31.6% |
1 year | -36.9% | -46% | 15.9% |
DDI vs Sector: DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. has outperformed the "Telecom" sector by 9.13% over the past year.
DDI vs Market: DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. has significantly underperformed the market by -52.73% over the past year.
Stable price: DDI is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: DDI with weekly volatility of -0.7089% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (9 $) is lower than the fair price (14.64 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (9 $) is 62.7% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (4.17) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.22).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (4.17) is lower than that of the market as a whole (90.03).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.6144) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-5.04).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.6144) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.39).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.52) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.65).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.52) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.12).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (1.56) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.19).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (1.56) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.91).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 25.93% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (25.93%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.01%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (15.8%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-61.69%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (15.8%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (11.64%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (14.51%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (8.1%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (14.51%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (9.21%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.1%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (9.21%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.08%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.35%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0.2508%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription