Max Chat
Company Analysis Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (12.02%) are higher than the sector average (1.2%).
- Current debt level 44.52% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 46.58%.
Disadvantages
- Price (5.96 $) is higher than fair price (4.06 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (-7.45%) is lower than the sector average (-5.32%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=5.15%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=40.21%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. | Industrials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.8% | -7% | 0.1% |
| 90 days | 3.5% | -7.6% | 24.3% |
| 1 year | -7.5% | -5.3% | 11.7% |
BBCP vs Sector: Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. has slightly underperformed the "Industrials" sector by -2.13% over the past year.
BBCP vs Market: Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -19.11% over the past year.
Stable price: BBCP is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: BBCP with weekly volatility of -0.1433% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (5.96 $) is higher than the fair price (4.06 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (5.96 $) is 31.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (18.74) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (33.56).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (18.74) is lower than that of the market as a whole (89.99).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.9441) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.67).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.9441) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.37).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.7132) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.27).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.7132) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.11).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.16) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.86).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.16) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.19).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -25.31% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-25.31%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (2.98%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (5.15%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.21%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (5.15%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.64%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.8%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.36%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.8%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.63%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.01%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 12.02% is higher than the average for the sector '1.2%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 12.02% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=1.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 12.02% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
