Company Analysis Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (2.72 $) is less than fair price (2.85 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (11.48%) is higher than the sector average (-49.42%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.2208%).
- Current debt level 3.22% has increased over 5 years from 2.04%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-93.98%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=-11.56%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited | Communication Services | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -5.6% | -47.6% | -1.6% |
| 90 days | -15.3% | -11.5% | 1.7% |
| 1 year | 11.5% | -49.4% | 20.4% |
BAOS vs Sector: Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited has outperformed the "Communication Services" sector by 60.89% over the past year.
BAOS vs Market: Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -8.88% over the past year.
Stable price: BAOS is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: BAOS with weekly volatility of 0.2207% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (2.72 $) is lower than the fair price (2.85 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (2.72 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 4.8%.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-0.1574) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2298.79).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-0.1574) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-65.33).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.3602) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (952.93).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.3602) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.62).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (8.56) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (94.21).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (8.56) is lower than that of the market as a whole (138.73).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-0.1722) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1291.34).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-0.1722) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-48.34).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 91.96% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (91.96%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-29142.18%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-93.98%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-11.56%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-93.98%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (-10.16%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-76.69%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-4.62%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-76.69%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.05%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.12%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.78%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.2208%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
