MAX
Company Analysis Mission Produce, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (25.8%) is higher than the sector average (-32.28%).
- Current debt level 22.37% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 22.98%.
Disadvantages
- Price (13.57 $) is higher than fair price (7.27 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.26%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=6.98%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=12.82%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Mission Produce, Inc. | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.1% | -0.1% | -1.3% |
| 90 days | 13.1% | -18.3% | -0.3% |
| 1 year | 25.8% | -32.3% | 14.2% |
AVO vs Sector: Mission Produce, Inc. has outperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by 58.09% over the past year.
AVO vs Market: Mission Produce, Inc. has outperformed the market by 11.59% over the past year.
Stable price: AVO is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: AVO with weekly volatility of 0.5% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (13.57 $) is higher than the fair price (7.27 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (13.57 $) is 46.4% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (23.14) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (22.35).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (23.14) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-104.3).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.47) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.09).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.47) is lower than that of the market as a whole (72.17).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.69) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.59).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.69) is lower than that of the market as a whole (114).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.11) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.11).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.11) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-78.04).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -3.65% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-3.65%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (84.93%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (6.98%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.82%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (6.98%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-6.22%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.89%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.57%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.89%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.45%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.71%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.79%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.26%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
