MAX
Company Analysis Forafric Global PLC Warrants
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.81 $) is less than fair price (1.55 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (-2.9%) is higher than the sector average (-18.37%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.35%).
- Current debt level 67.45% has increased over 5 years from 54.5%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-230.33%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.63%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Forafric Global PLC Warrants | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -12.4% | -9.7% | -2.4% |
| 90 days | -46.4% | -2.9% | -7.8% |
| 1 year | -2.9% | -18.4% | 17.4% |
AFRIW vs Sector: Forafric Global PLC Warrants has outperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by 15.47% over the past year.
AFRIW vs Market: Forafric Global PLC Warrants has significantly underperformed the market by -20.29% over the past year.
Stable price: AFRIW is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: AFRIW with weekly volatility of -0.0557% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.81 $) is lower than the fair price (1.55 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.81 $) is 91.4% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-0.57) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.09).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-0.57) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-63.23).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (6.02) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.01).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (6.02) is lower than that of the market as a whole (72.64).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.12) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.48).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.12) is lower than that of the market as a whole (120.26).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-65.77) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.36).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-65.77) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-81.37).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 42.5% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (42.5%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (101.18%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-230.33%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.63%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-230.33%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.6%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-8.76%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.78%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-8.76%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.23%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.71%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.79%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.35%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
