Company Analysis Aura FAT Projects Acquisition Corp
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (8.45%) is higher than the sector average (-29.14%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=9.64%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=5.61%)
Disadvantages
- Price (11.07 $) is higher than fair price (2.4 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.93%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Aura FAT Projects Acquisition Corp | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -11.3% | -0.3% |
| 90 days | 1.3% | -35.8% | 8.1% |
| 1 year | 8.4% | -29.1% | 30.1% |
AFAR vs Sector: Aura FAT Projects Acquisition Corp has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 37.59% over the past year.
AFAR vs Market: Aura FAT Projects Acquisition Corp has significantly underperformed the market by -21.67% over the past year.
Stable price: AFAR is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: AFAR with weekly volatility of 0.1625% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (11.07 $) is higher than the fair price (2.4 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (11.07 $) is 78.3% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (49.95) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (38.91).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (49.95) is higher than that of the market as a whole (48.79).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (4.81) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.6287).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (4.81) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.36).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.98).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.23).
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-71.83) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.88).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-71.83) is lower than that of the market as a whole (28.28).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (4.17%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (9.64%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (5.61%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (9.64%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.82%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (7.78%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (5.48%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (7.78%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.51%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.05%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.93%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
