Company Analysis Нефтекамский автозавод
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (-42.57%) is higher than the sector average (-44.35%).
- Current debt level 0% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 31.55%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.79%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-52.37%)
Disadvantages
- Price (257 ₽) is higher than fair price (94.14 ₽)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.9642%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Нефтекамский автозавод | Машиностроение | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -3% | -21.6% | 1.1% |
| 90 days | -15.7% | -26.3% | -5.8% |
| 1 year | -42.6% | -44.4% | -16.8% |
NFAZ vs Sector: Нефтекамский автозавод has outperformed the "Машиностроение" sector by 1.78% over the past year.
NFAZ vs Market: Нефтекамский автозавод has significantly underperformed the market by -25.77% over the past year.
Stable price: NFAZ is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Московская биржа" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NFAZ with weekly volatility of -0.8187% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (257 ₽) is higher than the fair price (94.14 ₽).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (257 ₽) is 63.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (28.61) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (12.02).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (28.61) is higher than that of the market as a whole (14.68).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.15) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.62).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.15) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.15).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.1166) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.7348).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.1166) is lower than that of the market as a whole (1.91).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (8.49) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-27.55).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (8.49) is higher than that of the market as a whole (2.22).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -33.7% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-33.7%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (102.08%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.79%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-52.37%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.79%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (68.42%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.9212%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.01%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.9212%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.61%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (29.89%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.66%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (29.89%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (16.32%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.9642%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
