Company Analysis Саратовский НПЗ
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (9350 ₽) is less than fair price (15123 ₽)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (6.49%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-24.6%) is lower than the sector average (-17.89%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=18.65%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Саратовский НПЗ | Нефтегаз | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 5.6% | 3.2% | 7.4% |
| 90 days | -4.6% | 4% | 17.1% |
| 1 year | -24.6% | -17.9% | -0.7% |
KRKN vs Sector: Саратовский НПЗ has significantly underperformed the "Нефтегаз" sector by -6.71% over the past year.
KRKN vs Market: Саратовский НПЗ has significantly underperformed the market by -23.9% over the past year.
Stable price: KRKN is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Московская биржа" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: KRKN with weekly volatility of -0.473% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (9350 ₽) is lower than the fair price (15123 ₽).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (9350 ₽) is 61.7% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.74).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (14.68).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.15).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.15).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.74).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (1.91).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.64).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.22).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -20% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-20%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.65%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (68.42%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.11%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (17.61%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (15.91%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (11.95%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (15.91%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.32%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '6.49%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.14.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
