Company Analysis ЕМС
1. Summary
Advantages
- Current debt level 51.21% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 52.44%.
Disadvantages
- Price (391.8 ₽) is higher than fair price (90.75 ₽)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (8.03%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-32.12%) is lower than the sector average (-6.02%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=30.2%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=30.79%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
ЕМС | Потреб | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -1.1% | 3.5% | -4.2% |
90 days | 12.8% | -6.4% | -1.2% |
1 year | -32.1% | -6% | -11.7% |
EMS vs Sector: ЕМС has significantly underperformed the "Потреб" sector by -26.1% over the past year.
EMS vs Market: ЕМС has significantly underperformed the market by -20.41% over the past year.
Stable price: EMS is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Московская биржа" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: EMS with weekly volatility of -0.6177% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (391.8 ₽) is higher than the fair price (90.75 ₽).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (391.8 ₽) is 76.8% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (10.8) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.85).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (10.8) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.26) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.6).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.26) is higher than that of the market as a whole (1.61).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.49) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.47).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.49) is higher than that of the market as a whole (0.8888).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.92) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (5.08).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.92) is higher than that of the market as a whole (1.28).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -10.38% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-10.38%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-10.69%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (30.2%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (30.79%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (30.2%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (14.01%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (9.9%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.85%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (9.9%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (7.63%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (5.24%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.31%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (5.24%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.06%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '8.03%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.21.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription