Max Chat
Company Analysis ChinaAMC MSCI China A 50 Connect ETF
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (3.06 HK$) is less than fair price (3.1 HK$)
- Dividends (2.18%) are higher than the sector average (0%).
Disadvantages
- The stock's return over the last year (13.01%) is lower than the sector average (32.58%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=0%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| ChinaAMC MSCI China A 50 Connect ETF | ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π· | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1.8% | -0.6% | -1.6% |
| 90 days | 6.1% | 0.5% | 4.5% |
| 1 year | 13% | 32.6% | 34.2% |
9839 vs Sector: ChinaAMC MSCI China A 50 Connect ETF has significantly underperformed the "ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π·" sector by -19.57% over the past year.
9839 vs Market: ChinaAMC MSCI China A 50 Connect ETF has significantly underperformed the market by -21.2% over the past year.
Stable price: 9839 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 9839 with weekly volatility of 0.2502% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (3.06 HK$) is lower than the fair price (3.1 HK$).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (3.06 HK$) is slightly lower than the fair price by 1.3%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43.79).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (1.59).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.5).
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.93).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.89%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.12%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.88%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.18% is higher than the average for the sector '0%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.18% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.75.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.18% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
