Company Analysis Madison Holdings Group Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.075 HK$) is less than fair price (0.1228 HK$)
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=63.23%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=17.62%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (4.27%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-50%) is lower than the sector average (-29.14%).
- Current debt level 70.24% has increased over 5 years from 19.52%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Madison Holdings Group Limited | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.3% | 1.6% | 4.4% |
| 90 days | -42.3% | -23.6% | 1.7% |
| 1 year | -50% | -29.1% | 31.7% |
8057 vs Sector: Madison Holdings Group Limited has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by -20.86% over the past year.
8057 vs Market: Madison Holdings Group Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -81.66% over the past year.
Stable price: 8057 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 8057 with weekly volatility of -0.9615% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.075 HK$) is lower than the fair price (0.1228 HK$).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.075 HK$) is 63.7% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (21.92) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (30.88).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (21.92) is lower than that of the market as a whole (26.88).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.5721) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.45).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.5721) is lower than that of the market as a whole (1.66).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.9518) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.03).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.9518) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.66).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.55) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.63).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.55) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.93).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -18.84% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-18.84%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.18%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (63.23%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (17.62%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (63.23%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.92%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-4.14%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.91%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-4.14%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.34%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '4.27%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
