Company Analysis ChinaAMC CSI 300 Index ETF
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (51.9 HK$) is less than fair price (52.61 HK$)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (1.15%) are below the sector average (12.56%).
- The stock's return over the last year (18.73%) is lower than the sector average (40.16%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=18.3%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| ChinaAMC CSI 300 Index ETF | ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π· | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0% | -3% | 1.3% |
| 90 days | 14.2% | 2.3% | 5.2% |
| 1 year | 18.7% | 40.2% | 36.8% |
3188 vs Sector: ChinaAMC CSI 300 Index ETF has significantly underperformed the "ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π·" sector by -21.43% over the past year.
3188 vs Market: ChinaAMC CSI 300 Index ETF has significantly underperformed the market by -18.06% over the past year.
Stable price: 3188 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 3188 with weekly volatility of 0.3601% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (51.9 HK$) is lower than the fair price (52.61 HK$).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (51.9 HK$) is slightly lower than the fair price by 1.4%.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (27.97).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (65.62).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.14).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.74).
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.13).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.75).
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.42).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (37.83).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0.1073%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.3%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.77%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.86%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.68%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.14%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (14.67%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 1.15% is below the average for the sector '12.56%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 1.15% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 1.15% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
