Company Analysis Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (2162 HK$) is less than fair price (2374.05 HK$)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (12.56%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-2.3%) is lower than the sector average (40.16%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=18.3%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF | ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π· | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.5% | -3% | 1.3% |
| 90 days | 2.8% | 2.3% | 5.2% |
| 1 year | -2.3% | 40.2% | 36.8% |
3015 vs Sector: Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF has significantly underperformed the "ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π·" sector by -42.46% over the past year.
3015 vs Market: Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF has significantly underperformed the market by -39.09% over the past year.
Stable price: 3015 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 3015 with weekly volatility of -0.0443% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (2162 HK$) is lower than the fair price (2374.05 HK$).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (2162 HK$) is slightly lower than the fair price by 9.8%.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (27.97).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (65.62).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.14).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.74).
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.13).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.75).
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.42).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (37.83).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0.1073%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.3%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.77%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.86%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.68%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.14%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (14.67%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '12.56%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
