MAX Chat
Company Analysis MGM China Holdings Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (14.24 HK$) is less than fair price (14.55 HK$)
- The stock's return over the last year (40.16%) is higher than the sector average (10.04%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (5.14%) are below the sector average (5.4%).
- Current debt level 74.89% has increased over 5 years from 51.81%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1151.29%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=-12.05%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| MGM China Holdings Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 10.6% | 1.2% | 3.3% |
| 90 days | 41.8% | 38.8% | 16% |
| 1 year | 40.2% | 10% | 42.5% |
2282 vs Sector: MGM China Holdings Limited has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 30.11% over the past year.
2282 vs Market: MGM China Holdings Limited has underperformed the market marginally by -2.37% over the past year.
Stable price: 2282 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 2282 with weekly volatility of 0.7723% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (14.24 HK$) is lower than the fair price (14.55 HK$).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (14.24 HK$) is slightly lower than the fair price by 2.2%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (8.04) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (129.64).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (8.04) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43.79).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (70.13) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.57).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (70.13) is higher than that of the market as a whole (1.59).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.18) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.13).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.18) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.5).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-35.45) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.98).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-35.45) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.93).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -37.7% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-37.7%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-8.95%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1151.29%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-12.05%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1151.29%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.89%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (15.4%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.7%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (15.4%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.12%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.88%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.88%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 5.14% is below the average for the sector '5.4%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 5.14% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 5.14% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (57.82%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
