Max Chat
Company Analysis Fulu Holdings Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=1.57%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-12.18%)
Disadvantages
- Price (1.54 HK$) is higher than fair price (0.3831 HK$)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (5.4%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-23.76%) is lower than the sector average (8.89%).
- Current debt level 3.07% has increased over 5 years from 0.2477%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Fulu Holdings Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1.3% | 1.6% | -1.6% |
| 90 days | -6.7% | 44.1% | 4.5% |
| 1 year | -23.8% | 8.9% | 34.2% |
2101 vs Sector: Fulu Holdings Limited has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -32.65% over the past year.
2101 vs Market: Fulu Holdings Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -57.97% over the past year.
Stable price: 2101 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 2101 with weekly volatility of -0.457% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1.54 HK$) is higher than the fair price (0.3831 HK$).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1.54 HK$) is 75.1% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (36.37) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (129.64).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (36.37) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43.79).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.5723) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.57).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.5723) is lower than that of the market as a whole (1.59).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.04) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.13).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.04) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.5).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (11.89) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.98).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (11.89) is higher than that of the market as a whole (9.93).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -16.66% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-16.66%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-8.95%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (1.57%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-12.18%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (1.57%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.89%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.14%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.7%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.14%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.12%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.88%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.88%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '5.4%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.5.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0.2777%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
