Company Analysis Fosun Tourism Group
1. Summary
Advantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=11.57%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=0.92%)
Disadvantages
- Price (3.4 HK$) is higher than fair price (2.13 HK$)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (4.32%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-40.04%) is lower than the sector average (13.35%).
- Current debt level 60.35% has increased over 5 years from 19.77%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Fosun Tourism Group | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -15% | 0.1% | 2.1% |
| 90 days | 0.9% | 19% | 17.8% |
| 1 year | -40% | 13.3% | 23.4% |
1992 vs Sector: Fosun Tourism Group has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -53.38% over the past year.
1992 vs Market: Fosun Tourism Group has significantly underperformed the market by -63.43% over the past year.
Stable price: 1992 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 1992 with weekly volatility of -0.7699% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (3.4 HK$) is higher than the fair price (2.13 HK$).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (3.4 HK$) is 37.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (23.02) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (27.52).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (23.02) is lower than that of the market as a whole (26.67).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.7) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-89.5).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.7) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-11.94).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.4123) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.26).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.4123) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.77).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.31) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.02).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.31) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.94).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -10.85% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (-9.31%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-10.85%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (-9.31%) is lower than the return for the sector (-1.37%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (11.57%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.92%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (11.57%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.3%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.7192%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.29%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.7192%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.39%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '4.32%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.5.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
