HKEX: 1928 - Sands China Ltd.

Yield per half year: +8.18%
Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Analysis Sands China Ltd.

Download the report: word Word pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • Current debt level 99.24% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 361.25%.

Disadvantages

  • Price (14.12 HK$) is higher than fair price (0.7532 HK$)
  • Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (4.32%).
  • The stock's return over the last year (-4.29%) is lower than the sector average (13.35%).
  • The company's current efficiency (ROE=-196.59%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=0.92%)

Similar companies

Li Auto Inc.

Meituan

NIO Inc.

Galaxy Entertainment Group Limited

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.2. News

No news yet

2.3. Market efficiency

Sands China Ltd. Consumer Cyclical Index
7 days 5.8% 0.1% 4.3%
90 days 45.9% 19% 18.3%
1 year -4.3% 13.3% 25.9%

1928 vs Sector: Sands China Ltd. has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -17.63% over the past year.

1928 vs Market: Sands China Ltd. has significantly underperformed the market by -30.18% over the past year.

Stable price: 1928 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: 1928 with weekly volatility of -0.0824% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 33.69
P/S: 3.57

3.2. Revenue

EPS 0.0855
ROE -196.59%
ROA 6.65%
ROIC 0%
Ebitda margin -26.6%

4. Fundamental Analysis

4.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Above fair price: The current price (14.12 HK$) is higher than the fair price (0.7532 HK$).

Price is higher than fair: The current price (14.12 HK$) is 94.7% higher than the fair price.

4.2. P/E

P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (33.69) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (27.52).

P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (33.69) is higher than that of the market as a whole (26.67).

4.2.1 P/E Similar companies

4.3. P/BV

P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-5827.68) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-89.5).

P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-5827.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (-11.94).

4.4. P/S

P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.57) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.26).

P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.57) is higher than that of the market as a whole (2.77).

4.4.1 P/S Similar companies

4.5. EV/Ebitda

EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-495.55) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.02).

EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-495.55) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.94).

5. Profitability

5.1. Profitability and revenue

5.2. Earnings per share - EPS

5.3. Past profitability Net Income

Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -13.19% over the last 5 years.

Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-13.19%).

Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-1.37%).

5.4. ROE

ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-196.59%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.92%).

ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-196.59%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.3%).

5.5. ROA

ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (6.65%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.29%).

ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (6.65%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.39%).

5.6. ROIC

ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).

ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).

6. Finance

6.1. Assets and debt

Debt Level: (99.24%) is a bit high in relation to assets.

Debt reduction: over 5 years, the debt has decreased from 361.25% to 99.24%.

Excess of debt: The debt is not covered by net income, percentage 1471.1%.

6.2. Profit growth and share price

7. Dividends

7.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '4.32%.

7.2. Stability and increase in payments

Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.

Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

7.3. Payout percentage

Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.

8. Insider trades

8.1. Insider trading

Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

8.2. Latest transactions

No insider transactions have been recorded yet

Pay for your subscription

More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription

9. Stocks forum Sands China Ltd.

9.3. Comments