Company Analysis China XLX Fertiliser Ltd.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (3.94 HK$) is less than fair price (4.5 HK$)
- Dividends (13.84%) are higher than the sector average (4.5%).
- The stock's return over the last year (19.76%) is higher than the sector average (11.94%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=14.6%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=6.51%)
Disadvantages
- Current debt level 43.75% has increased over 5 years from 25.3%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| China XLX Fertiliser Ltd. | Materials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0.5% | 0.1% | -0.8% |
| 90 days | -6.2% | -2% | 20.6% |
| 1 year | 19.8% | 11.9% | 42.2% |
1866 vs Sector: China XLX Fertiliser Ltd. has outperformed the "Materials" sector by 7.82% over the past year.
1866 vs Market: China XLX Fertiliser Ltd. has significantly underperformed the market by -22.41% over the past year.
Stable price: 1866 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 1866 with weekly volatility of 0.3799% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (3.94 HK$) is lower than the fair price (4.5 HK$).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (3.94 HK$) is slightly lower than the fair price by 14.2%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (3.47) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (37.06).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (3.47) is lower than that of the market as a whole (26.64).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.3564) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.7311).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.3564) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-11.94).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.1755) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.7923).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.1755) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.76).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (3.48) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.38).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (3.48) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.94).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 41.91% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (41.91%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (290.64%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (14.6%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.51%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (14.6%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.28%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.73%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.89%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.73%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.38%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 13.84% is higher than the average for the sector '4.5%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 13.84% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.86.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 13.84% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 3 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (29.72%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
