Tang Palace (China) Holdings Limited

HKEX
1181
Stock
Yield per half year: -2.6%
Dividend yield: 8.82%
Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Analysis Tang Palace (China) Holdings Limited

Download the report: word Word pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • Price (0.187 HK$) is less than fair price (0.2075 HK$)
  • Dividends (8.82%) are higher than the sector average (5.4%).
  • Current debt level 24.87% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 38.11%.
  • The company's current efficiency (ROE=-8.5%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-12.05%)

Disadvantages

  • The stock's return over the last year (-11.37%) is lower than the sector average (0%).

Similar companies

Meituan

Alibaba Group Holding Limited

JD.com, Inc.

BYD Company Limited

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.3. Market efficiency

Tang Palace (China) Holdings Limited Consumer Cyclical Index
7 days 9.4% 0.5% 3.3%
90 days 10% 42.2% 16%
1 year -11.4% 0% 42.5%

1181 vs Sector: Tang Palace (China) Holdings Limited has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -11.37% over the past year.

1181 vs Market: Tang Palace (China) Holdings Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -53.91% over the past year.

Stable price: 1181 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: 1181 with weekly volatility of -0.2187% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 12.78
P/S: 0.208

3.2. Revenue

EPS -0.0176
ROE -8.5%
ROA -2.42%
ROIC 0%
Ebitda margin -2.51%

4. Fundamental Analysis

4.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Below fair price: The current price (0.187 HK$) is lower than the fair price (0.2075 HK$).

Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (0.187 HK$) is slightly lower than the fair price by 11%.

4.2. P/E

P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (12.78) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (129.64).

P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (12.78) is lower than that of the market as a whole (43.79).

4.2.1 P/E Similar companies

4.3. P/BV

P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.03) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.57).

P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.03) is lower than that of the market as a whole (1.59).

4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies

4.4. P/S

P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.208) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.13).

P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.208) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.5).

4.4.1 P/S Similar companies

4.5. EV/Ebitda

EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-18.6) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (23.98).

EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-18.6) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.93).

5. Profitability

5.1. Profitability and revenue

5.2. Earnings per share - EPS

5.3. Past profitability Net Income

Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -106.43% over the last 5 years.

Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-106.43%).

Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-8.95%).

5.4. ROE

ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-8.5%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-12.05%).

ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-8.5%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.89%).

5.5. ROA

ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-2.42%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.7%).

ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-2.42%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.12%).

5.6. ROIC

ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.88%).

ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.88%).

6. Finance

6.1. Assets and debt

Debt level: (24.87%) is quite low in relation to assets.

Debt reduction: over 5 years, the debt has decreased from 38.11% to 24.87%.

Excess of debt: The debt is not covered by net income, percentage -999.26%.

6.2. Profit growth and share price

7. Dividends

7.1. Dividend yield vs Market

High yield: The dividend yield of the company 8.82% is higher than the average for the sector '5.4%.

7.2. Stability and increase in payments

Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 8.82% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.

Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 8.82% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

7.3. Payout percentage

Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (127.73%) are at an uncomfortable level.

8. Insider trades

8.1. Insider trading

Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

8.2. Latest transactions

No insider transactions have been recorded yet

Pay for your subscription

More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription

9. Stocks forum Tang Palace (China) Holdings Limited

9.3. Comments