Company Analysis Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (8.65%) are higher than the sector average (6.63%).
- The stock's return over the last year (20.62%) is higher than the sector average (1.86%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1.89%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-7.46%)
Disadvantages
- Price (5.03 HK$) is higher than fair price (5.01 HK$)
- Current debt level 25.51% has increased over 5 years from 19.7%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust | Real Estate | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -0.4% | -1% | 1.4% |
90 days | 12.5% | 16.9% | 8.7% |
1 year | 20.6% | 1.9% | 45.5% |
0778 vs Sector: Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust has outperformed the "Real Estate" sector by 18.76% over the past year.
0778 vs Market: Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust has significantly underperformed the market by -24.83% over the past year.
Stable price: 0778 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 0778 with weekly volatility of 0.3966% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (5.03 HK$) is higher than the fair price (5.01 HK$).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (5.03 HK$) is 0.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (23.55) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (28.36).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (23.55) is lower than that of the market as a whole (46.9).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.3012) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.622).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.3012) is lower than that of the market as a whole (1.76).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (4.65) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.19).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (4.65) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.02).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.68) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-4.26).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (34.95).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -16.75% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-16.75%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1.89%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-7.46%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1.89%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.38%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-1.33%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.11%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-1.33%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.08%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.39%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (18.56%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 8.65% is higher than the average for the sector '6.63%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 8.65% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.64.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 8.65% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (168.93%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription