Company Analysis ENM Holdings Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Current debt level 2.21% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 5.02%.
Disadvantages
- Price (0.275 HK$) is higher than fair price (0.1149 HK$)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (5.63%).
- The stock's return over the last year (1.85%) is lower than the sector average (32.8%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1.79%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=0.92%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| ENM Holdings Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 5.8% | 4.5% | -1.1% |
| 90 days | 3.8% | 12.7% | 16.6% |
| 1 year | 1.9% | 32.8% | 42.9% |
0128 vs Sector: ENM Holdings Limited has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -30.95% over the past year.
0128 vs Market: ENM Holdings Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -41.06% over the past year.
Stable price: 0128 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Hong Kong Exchanges" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 0128 with weekly volatility of 0.0356% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (0.275 HK$) is higher than the fair price (0.1149 HK$).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (0.275 HK$) is 58.2% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (26.44) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (27.52).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (26.44) is lower than that of the market as a whole (26.8).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.4406) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-89.5).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.4406) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-11.95).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.89) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.26).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.89) is higher than that of the market as a whole (2.7).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-2.36) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (24.02).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-2.36) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.94).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -53.24% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-53.24%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-45.59%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1.79%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.92%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1.79%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.98%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-1.72%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.29%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-1.72%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.18%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '5.63%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
