Company Analysis TARC Limited
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (184.9 βΉ) is higher than fair price (56.66 βΉ)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.4682%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-16.88%) is lower than the sector average (4.73%).
- Current debt level 40.04% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-5.87%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=4.53%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| TARC Limited | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.1% | -35.4% | 1.6% |
| 90 days | 24.1% | -23% | 7.2% |
| 1 year | -16.9% | 4.7% | 6.7% |
TARC vs Sector: TARC Limited has significantly underperformed the "Real Estate" sector by -21.61% over the past year.
TARC vs Market: TARC Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -23.61% over the past year.
Stable price: TARC is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Bombay Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: TARC with weekly volatility of -0.3246% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (184.9 βΉ) is higher than the fair price (56.66 βΉ).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (184.9 βΉ) is 69.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (49.47) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (135.67).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (49.47) is higher than that of the market as a whole (44.6).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.28) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.36).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.28) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.33).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (37.49) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (49.52).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (37.49) is higher than that of the market as a whole (8.99).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (13.79) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (86.12).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (13.79) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.13).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -49.02% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-49.02%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (26.81%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-5.87%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.53%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-5.87%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (-1.52%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-2.33%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.19%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-2.33%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.42%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.4%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (13.44%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.4682%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
