Max Chat
Company Analysis Restaurant Brands Asia Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (78.83 βΉ) is less than fair price (112.26 βΉ)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.28%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-29.62%) is lower than the sector average (4.3%).
- Current debt level 6.28% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-30.02%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=15.54%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Restaurant Brands Asia Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.5% | 1.3% | -0.3% |
| 90 days | 7.5% | 11.3% | 12.6% |
| 1 year | -29.6% | 4.3% | 4.1% |
RBA vs Sector: Restaurant Brands Asia Limited has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -33.92% over the past year.
RBA vs Market: Restaurant Brands Asia Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -33.7% over the past year.
Stable price: RBA is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Bombay Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: RBA with weekly volatility of -0.5695% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (78.83 βΉ) is lower than the fair price (112.26 βΉ).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (78.83 βΉ) is 42.4% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (35.43).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (44.6).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (8.32) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.01).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (8.32) is higher than that of the market as a whole (5.33).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.17) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.06).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.17) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.99).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (29.16) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (12.88).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (29.16) is higher than that of the market as a whole (15.13).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 36.93% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (36.93%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-10.44%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-30.02%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.54%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-30.02%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (-1.52%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-8.38%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.77%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-8.38%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.42%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.16%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (13.44%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.28%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
