Company Analysis Quick Heal Technologies Limited
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (290.95 βΉ) is higher than fair price (41.93 βΉ)
- Dividends (0.7976%) are below the sector average (1.8%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-44.24%) is lower than the sector average (-1.48%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=5.66%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=17.99%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Quick Heal Technologies Limited | Technology | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -7.3% | -5.5% | 4% |
| 90 days | -54.7% | -27.7% | -2.2% |
| 1 year | -44.2% | -1.5% | 6.5% |
QUICKHEAL vs Sector: Quick Heal Technologies Limited has significantly underperformed the "Technology" sector by -42.75% over the past year.
QUICKHEAL vs Market: Quick Heal Technologies Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -50.77% over the past year.
Stable price: QUICKHEAL is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Bombay Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: QUICKHEAL with weekly volatility of -0.8507% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (290.95 βΉ) is higher than the fair price (41.93 βΉ).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (290.95 βΉ) is 85.6% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (106.76) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (57.52).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (106.76) is higher than that of the market as a whole (44.41).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (5.92) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (28.51).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (5.92) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.25).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (8.87) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.96).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (8.87) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.99).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (348.19) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (19.49).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (348.19) is higher than that of the market as a whole (15.13).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -13.48% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-13.48%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-36.23%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (5.66%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.99%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (5.66%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-1.34%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.82%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.37%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.82%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.54%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.44%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.2%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0.7976% is below the average for the sector '1.8%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0.7976% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0.7976% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (54.83%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
