Company Analysis Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (52.08 βΉ) is less than fair price (61.38 βΉ)
- The stock's return over the last year (-15.82%) is higher than the sector average (-17.51%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=13.82%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=11.78%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.62%).
- Current debt level 280.18% has increased over 5 years from 130.94%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited | Communication Services | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 1.9% | 1% | -0.3% |
90 days | 22.5% | 12.5% | 10.7% |
1 year | -15.8% | -17.5% | 3.3% |
MTNL vs Sector: Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited has outperformed the "Communication Services" sector by 1.69% over the past year.
MTNL vs Market: Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -19.14% over the past year.
Stable price: MTNL is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Bombay Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MTNL with weekly volatility of -0.3043% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (52.08 βΉ) is lower than the fair price (61.38 βΉ).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (52.08 βΉ) is slightly lower than the fair price by 17.9%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0.86) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (61.29).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0.86) is lower than that of the market as a whole (44.6).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-0.0869) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.72).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-0.0869) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.33).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.57) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.24).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.57) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.99).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (175.07) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (32.4).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (175.07) is higher than that of the market as a whole (15.13).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 6.55% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (6.55%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-32.37%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (13.82%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (11.78%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (13.82%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-1.52%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-30.49%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (-3.52%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-30.49%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.42%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.91%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (13.44%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.62%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription