Company Analysis 3P Land Holdings Ltd
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (40.89 βΉ) is higher than fair price (10.05 βΉ)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.4599%).
- The stock's return over the last year (28.48%) is lower than the sector average (44.97%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=2.19%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=4.27%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
3P Land Holdings Ltd | Real Estate | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 3.1% | -0.8% | 4.2% |
90 days | -46.8% | -27.8% | -2.1% |
1 year | 28.5% | 45% | 6.7% |
3PLAND vs Sector: 3P Land Holdings Ltd has significantly underperformed the "Real Estate" sector by -16.49% over the past year.
3PLAND vs Market: 3P Land Holdings Ltd has outperformed the market by 21.82% over the past year.
Stable price: 3PLAND is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Bombay Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 3PLAND with weekly volatility of 0.5477% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (40.89 βΉ) is higher than the fair price (10.05 βΉ).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (40.89 βΉ) is 75.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (30.33) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (137.23).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (30.33) is lower than that of the market as a whole (44.41).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.5554) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.19).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.5554) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.25).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (19.04) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (49.28).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (19.04) is higher than that of the market as a whole (8.99).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (86.12).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.13).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -10.21% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-10.21%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (120.03%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (2.19%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.27%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (2.19%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-1.34%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.1%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.07%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.1%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.54%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.3%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.2%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.4599%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.75.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription